Ranajit Pal states in the website that Romila Thapar who is the co-recipient of the one million Dollar Kluge prize also admitted she did not know enough to comment on Pal's work.Ĭoming back to the repair work again the sentence "H.C. Someone who probably reads little else than textbooks says he does not know enough to form an opinion but dislikes what was there and you oblige him by removing all that he does not like. I think the repair work was very damaging. Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejda ( talk The next sentence, "Robin Lane Fox has written that Sisines the Persian who is said to have met Alexander in Cilicia was in fact an ally of the latter." is also meaningless as it is without any context. Raychaudhuri noted that the name Priyadarshi was adopted also by Chandragupta and as noted by W.
![chandragupta maurya serial review chandragupta maurya serial review](https://nettv4u.com/imagine/15-03-2019/khan-jaan.jpg)
Also your exasperation is evident in that the sentence in the Wiki article "H.C. The book has been reveiwed by Jan-Mathieu Carbon of Corpus Christi college, Oxford University,( ) and also in the prestigious Bryn Mawr Classical Reveiw ( ). According to him Diodotus of Erythrae was also Chandragupta. 88) that Orontobates was Chandragupta who was Rantivarma of the Mudrarakshasa. Why are no archaeological relics of Chandragupta known from anywhere in the world? Is this something that we should be silent about ? Pal maintains in his book "Non-Jonesian Indology and Alexander" (p. I believe that apart from elaborating the current academic position, even if one detests 'original research', it is the duty of the writer to point to the problems in the current theory. He maintains that Palibothra cannot be Patna because not a single artifact of any Maurya or Nanda king has been unearthed here. In this article Pal discusses some issues like the location of Palibothra which are of prime importance in world history. Witzel of Harvard calls Pal a hijacker which appears to be more appropriate. 78-101) carries an article by Ranajit Pal whom you characterize as a vandal. The current issue of the classics journal Scholia (vol. Many thanks, John Hill ( talk) 00:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC) We should probably also check other articles that are linked to it in case there has been similar vandalism on those pages. I will try to get back to it soon - but it would be very helpful if others could also check and, where necessary, repair "quotes" and claims. However, this article on Chandragupta (and all the quotes and references in it) needs to be carefully checked - as someone has been really misusing the Wikipedia. I have started replacing them with the proper quotes from the English translation by Rev.
![chandragupta maurya serial review chandragupta maurya serial review](https://i.pinimg.com/564x/84/c4/5a/84c45a12736a1b47f244a32c3e79b128.jpg)
However, I then started looking at some of the so-called "quotes" only to find that some of them seem to be completely made up (I have removed a couple of those), while others seem to be poorly rewritten versions - not the originals given at the place where the links take one to. Help requestedįurther note to the above: I have just started editing the main page and removed all the academic titles as per Wikipedia policy as well as some of the discussions of Ranajit Pal's speculations (but left a link to his site in case any one is interested in his alternate views). Cheers, John Hill ( talk) 23:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Repair work on this article. I will now have a look at this article and remove these speculations and give a reference to Pal's website for those who might be interested in some alternative views.
#CHANDRAGUPTA MAURYA SERIAL REVIEW FULL#
I have just gone through his website and found it full of accusations, suppositions and unsupported speculations. Ranajit Pal seems intent on rewriting practically the whole history of India and Persia. Varana ( talk) 22:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Dear Varana: I agree totally. They should either be condensed into a summary or deleted altogether. It'd be nice if someone with more knowledge on the topic than me could have a look at those passages. Under the "Origins" heading, there is a large section of views of a certain Ranajit Pal, whose website strikes me as a very odd piece of, errm, "original research" (to put it politely).
![chandragupta maurya serial review chandragupta maurya serial review](https://wikibiopic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/chanakya-sapatham-tamil-serial-polimer-tv-1-2-wikibiopic-img_5dad56170f5ee-600x600.jpg)
Nepal part of Mauryan Empire? but Bhutan isn't? 9 Infobox 'Jain' religion inserted by blocked user.7 Repair Work Is Another Instance of Editorial Intransigence.6 File:Maurya.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion.
![chandragupta maurya serial review chandragupta maurya serial review](https://i0.wp.com/www.reviewsansar.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/chanakya_chandra-nandini.jpg)
4 Correct the Salutation of Emperor chandragupta Maurya to "The Great".